<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://eclipse.dzone.com"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dz="http://www.developerzone.com/modules/dz/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Eclipse Zone - Comments for &quot;Who Needs an Online IDE?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://eclipse.dzone.com/news/who-needs-online-ide</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Who Needs an Online IDE?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>@ZvikiYou&#039;ve made my</title>
 <link>http://eclipse.dzone.com/news/who-needs-online-ide#comment-4336</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Zviki&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You&#039;ve made my argument in far better IT-Business speak than I ever could. :) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:04:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jeervin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4336 at http://eclipse.dzone.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@James, Check out this post</title>
 <link>http://eclipse.dzone.com/news/who-needs-online-ide#comment-4331</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;@James,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Check out &lt;a href=&quot;/news/why-use-swt-or-another-native-#comment-4327&quot;&gt;this post and my comment&lt;/a&gt; there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The major difference is that Firefox is consumer oriented and Eclipse is enterprise oriented, so it&#039;s not head to head competition. Nevertheless, there&#039;s a great opportunity here for Eclipse.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:02:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>zvikico</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4331 at http://eclipse.dzone.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>You know what about Eclipse</title>
 <link>http://eclipse.dzone.com/news/who-needs-online-ide#comment-4154</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;You know what about Eclipse as competition to Firefox?  It seems to me that the model of an OSGi container based RCP that is more easily provisioned would be a better place to focus.  I know that everything is right now all hyped on running from within a browser, but that wave will pass.  What you need is another answer to allow for easier provisioning and to leverage the computer on the client side better.  It seems that OSGi bundles that can be better provisioned is a better way to go.  It better allows for architectures that are not only client server, but indeed can blur the line between the two.</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:01:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jeervin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4154 at http://eclipse.dzone.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>That&#039;s true. I touched the</title>
 <link>http://eclipse.dzone.com/news/who-needs-online-ide#comment-2746</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s true. I touched the IDE side in this article. I plan to focus on the platform in a future post. I agree that there&#039;s real value. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, I would love to see IBM Symphony running inside my Mac first. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:06:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>zvikico</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2746 at http://eclipse.dzone.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>There is something more</title>
 <link>http://eclipse.dzone.com/news/who-needs-online-ide#comment-2745</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is something more about Eclipse going to online land: as you said, Eclipse is a platform and so, you will get more than an IDE. You get anything that could be created over the platform, as word processors, per instance. Imagine IBM Symphony running inside firefox.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kind Regards &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:20:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>marcos.pereira</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2745 at http://eclipse.dzone.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
